I don’t believe that trying to separate based on market behavior (selling / buying etc) would make sense.
disagree for option 1, I think we should not touch this part anymore but keep build + deliver more demand and utility.
5 Likes
You changed some part of it and that is nice of you.
This proposal still really sucks. And it is in favor of the team.
All these negative tension and stress you put on your community for recent weeks and this final hilarious proposal is the big Christmas present and new year present you gave to your users? Locking them for years?
Dude! I wrote a proposal. Have you read it? Or you don’t care at all. Ok! What about other users proposal? Don’t you like them? If yes ask the hidden hands behind the scenes to put it on voting and remove the whales and OTC buyers from voting.
Hashflow foundation is responsible for its past documents (NFTs holders token schedule). And Hashflow DAO is responsible for descions after TGE.
Don’t hide behind Hashflow DAO. You are responsible for your actions. NFT holders HFTs were in the sanctuary already before and after TGE. You don’t have the right to change it. Not the team nor the manipulated DAO. I don’t care about my own HFTs anymore I will send them to a charity. I have a friend who bought Hashflow NFTs at price of 0.5 HFT last year with a lot of Debts and now he is broken. yeah you are locking his tokens. Dude you had a bigger table of NFT based tokens on your docs. Are you even denying that? I have other Hashgang friends with a lot of contributions who worked their ass off to achieve those tokens. Why are you saying those are free tokens? They weren’t! They participated in every single campaigns you made and social activities. And traded when the Ethereum gas fee was 80 $ ! Those were money they spent. Everyone here in crypto are for Profits. Don’t lock people’s tokens for years. That’s not fair dude.
After TGE what did you do exactly? Vanishing. What did you exactly build after TGE? What new feature added? What new value you put on the product? except blaming NFT holders over and over. This is crazy 
. What happened to your Hollywood studios contract? Do you see the real dumping reasons? I know you just like the people who admires you as a king or legend but when a real person who is not part of the team or Hashmod criticize your descions you block or ban them for telling the truth.
By this Manipulated DAO, hiding be behind DAO descions you spread bad vibes between users. I searched Twitter nobody is satisfied by your actions and descions. Investors are in loss!! they bought tokens at 0.4 $ . Poor new users bought the token you dumped at TGE in the price of 3.5 $ to 1 $. Users who bought HFTs below 1 $ are in great loss. Early contributors are pissed in discord. NFT holders are getting executed and are depressed. Excuse me, who is on your side? Is this building? What are you doing in that office? Go turn around join other projects discord as like Bebop, Stargate, Galxe, CyberConnect, etc and watch the super good vibe and high user activities, laughes, positive attitudes. They also performed several campaigns during holidays. That’s the reason they are active. What did you bring to your community ? Hate? Stress? FUDs? Heart broken?
I used to think you were low EQ and I see you are low IQ as well. It’s not a offense! because a wise man won’t do things that drift apart the community and make people hate them. Yeah, close your eyes and be blind to these problems. Not investors, not new users, not old users are happy with your actions. Everybody are angry.
By the way I can see in Debank your team are NFT holders as well. Go to your Debank address in the NFT section, there are list of your NFTs. These NFTs had HFTs. Where did these HFTs go Mr transparent?
Are these HFTs locked? Or you delegated offchain to anonymous wallet and hide your trace? Don’t deny something that is in Debank NFT history section. 
Anyway. Dude, change the time of this new proposal. Don’t lock users under 100K tokens for years. Read my proposal. (Salvation proposal) Lock them until Hashverse launch. Vest them from Hashverse launch untill 3 months before team and investors get unlocked. Why not at the same time? Because team and investors have millions of HFTs . Our tokens are nothing compared to yours. Investors will dump on us next year and our tokens will suffer under whales dumpings. That’s not fair. Dude put yourself in our shoes just for a tiny little moment. Maybe you understand. Don’t lock us, our friends, your early contributors for years for God sake. We have Debts. please 
1 Like
Disagree In This Proposal.
Because This proposal, it looks like the team&investors are trying to do something to get the most benefits of themselves.
I think sometimes you must look at our hearts of community or early contributor.
I disagree with this proposal sir , Please look at build product and utility first.
Do you know , What’s the first things everyone must look and learn before contribute or invest in crypto project.
That’s Whitepaper of project as same as Hashflow doc.
Do you know , Whitepaper or Hashflow doc is the first your credibility before everyone will join Hashflow for contributed or invested.
because that’s the first things that everyone can know and learn about project
Then , What do you think about if someone can change rule or somethings on Hashflow doc after project launch.
At the moment , I think you are doing to discredit hashflow project , Cause of Something in DAO must improve efficiency.
In my mind , How to improve efficient of DAO for now I think DAO should not touch in Tokenomics or Something that is sanctuary as promised in hashflow doc.
because now you are doing to change something in sanctuary.
I hope my comments will be helpful.
May this new year be the beginning of the best years of your life.
best regards
sugartop
2 Likes
I totally disagree. Something strange!!
As I said I respectfully disagree, however I noticed some new actors got in the DAO and trying to cut off the emissions with their voting power to be able to help HFT token price, so If I have to make a choice between loosing them and vesting them for 2 years, I choose your proposal. cause I really do not think whales would allow other ongoing proposals pass.