# \[RFC\] Reschedule vesting of high potential sellers to slow down token emission **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [December 28, 2022, 12:41pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489 "2022-12-28T12:41:02Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 19\ **Page:** 1
**Author:** ![0xZZ](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/0xzz/32/108_2.png) [@0xZZ](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/0xZZ)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2022, 12:41pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/1 "2022-12-28T12:41:02Z")
- Title: [DRAFT] Reschedule vesting of high potential sellers to slow down token emission - Author(s): 0xZZ - Related Discussions: [[Implemented] Terminate vesting of HFT to NFT holders who hold less than 20% of claimed HFT](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/terminate-vesting-of-hft-to-nft-holders-who-hold-less-than-20-of-claimed-hft/447) - Submission Date: Dec 28, 2022 **Body Paragraphs:** - **Simple Summary:** The [related proposal](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/terminate-vesting-of-hft-to-nft-holders-who-hold-less-than-20-of-claimed-hft/447) which is on voting, attempted to terminate tokens of wrong users without any clear criteria. This proposal tries to fix it by not terminating but instead rescheduling and announcing clear criteria. - **Abstract:** NFT holders contain two groups of users: 1) loyal community members who contributed to the protocol in many campaigns. 2) secondary market buyers. We should respect their time/effort and money spent on NFTs. Currently, they have daily vesting at 1K ceiling and many proposals were sent on Snapshot to change the vesting and allocation somehow. Generally, I disagree with any changes that have been written and documented months ago but if we insist on it let’s do it with fewer side effects. - **Motivation:** It is disheartening to see the disregard for the ecosystem shown by large and consistent sellers. This constant sell pressure during the early stages of the HFT launch is toxic and could damage the protocol and the interests of all participants. By saying that, we can somehow act on high-potential sellers and slow their selling behavior down. - **Benefits (Pros)**: - **Downside (Cons)**: **Voting:** - _“Yes”_ to implement the specification and any subsequent proposal attempting to amend these terms shall be deemed to pose systemic risk to the DAO. - _“No”_ to continue HFT vesting for NFT holders that fit the current criteria ---
**Author:** ![tD1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3be4f8/32.png) [@tD1](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/tD1)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2022, 12:46pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/2 "2022-12-28T12:46:18Z")
Interesting one, since “terminate vesting” topic is not disclosed in original proposal at all ---
**Author:** ![parsa](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/parsa/32/27_2.png) [@parsa](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/parsa)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2022, 2:24pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/3 "2022-12-28T14:24:12Z")
I like the idea ✅ it’s better than [Terminate vesting](https://snapshot.org/#/hashflowdao.eth/proposal/0x784f4d8e92fe3567af1ced6f10ec557243d6ad00e7826563be57b1e88d31319c) ---
**Author:** ![neil.s](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/neil.s/32/66_2.png) [@neil.s](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/neil.s)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2022, 3:44pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/6 "2022-12-28T15:44:16Z")
Interesting point! And the question is do they(+ voting propsoal) improve the protocol? Do they provide any utility for HFT? Absolutely not. I just see trying in vain to make up for the loss in high-priced HFT buyers and they can’t endure it. Things are getting complicated, I wish we could let it go whatever it was before. ---
**Author:** ![tD1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/3be4f8/32.png) [@tD1](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/tD1)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2022, 4:35pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/8 "2022-12-28T16:35:33Z")
This proposal explains details of this one: > [@\[Implemented\] Terminate vesting of HFT to NFT holders who hold less than 20% of claimed HFT](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/terminate-vesting-of-hft-to-nft-holders-who-hold-less-than-20-of-claimed-hft/447): > > Proposal Structure Title: [DRAFT] Terminate vesting of HFT to NFT holders who hold less than 20% of claimed HFT Author(s): @hashflow-hodlerSubmission Date: Dec 20, 2022 Body Paragraphs Simple Summary: Terminate vesting of HFT immediately to NFT holders who held or staked less than 20% of the HFT that they claimed from Dec 7, 2022 to Dec 19, 2022. Exempted wallets are those that held or staked at least 40% of the HFT that they claimed over the first 30 days post-TGE (Nov 7, 2022). Abstrac… ---
**Author:** ![0xZZ](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/0xzz/32/108_2.png) [@0xZZ](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/0xZZ)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2022, 5:40pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/11 "2022-12-28T17:40:47Z")
@WorldWind , @neil.s I’m on your side guys. I’m really tired of proposals targeting NFT holders. They followed the token distribution table and vesting plan but still targeted, I said that on this proposal too. The only thing that made me write this proposal is the incomplete and greedy proposal in Snapshot that is on voting right now! Just look at it, full of bugs. I’m saying if someone insists on “changing something for NFT holders so that I can gain benefits” then let’s do it with more attention and fewer side effects. But if you have any questions or suggestions for this proposal, please let me know. ---
**Author:** ![NIKA](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/nika/32/141_2.png) [@NIKA](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/NIKA)\ **Post date:** [December 28, 2022, 6:41pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/12 "2022-12-28T18:41:31Z")
This proposal looks more flexible than the current proposal on snapshot for voting. (Terminate…) I’ve given my overall thoughts on these type of topics [here](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/draft-stop-any-changes-to-nft-allocations-and-focus-on-future-builds/469/17) ---
**Author:** ![yyyyyyyy](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/9fc29f/32.png) [@yyyyyyyy](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/yyyyyyyy)\ **Post date:** [December 30, 2022, 2:01pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/13 "2022-12-30T14:01:53Z")
I can agree with this proposal, but in order to solve the proposals that are constantly overturned later, it is required to add Put the NFT HFT award holder in “sanctuary” - neither the amount nor the vesting schedule can be changed by any subsequent offer ---
**Author:** ![0xZZ](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/0xzz/32/108_2.png) [@0xZZ](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/0xZZ)\ **Post date:** [December 30, 2022, 2:15pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/14 "2022-12-30T14:15:24Z")
Thanks for mentioning this. I’ve just added: > [@0xZZ](#): > > - After that, put the NFT holder HFT awards in a “sanctuary” – neither the amount nor the vesting schedule would be changeable by any subsequent proposal. And > [@0xZZ](#): > > - _“Yes”_ to implement locking allocation of affected addresses as VeHFT and any subsequent proposal attempting to amend these terms shall be deemed to pose systemic risk to the DAO. ---
**Author:** ![Tangmo](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/tangmo/32/109_2.png) [@Tangmo](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/Tangmo)\ **Post date:** [December 30, 2022, 2:30pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/15 "2022-12-30T14:30:58Z")
i agree because now have just many proposal need steal HFT form NFT ---
**Author:** ![neil.s](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/neil.s/32/66_2.png) [@neil.s](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/neil.s)\ **Post date:** [December 30, 2022, 8:25pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/16 "2022-12-30T20:25:18Z")
I think this proposal is absolutely better than the other vesting proposals so if we can’t finally stop the NFT holders’ vesting … **yes, I support this one**. Clear criteria, not terminating anyone’s allocation, and not so long locking period. ---
**Author:** ![AAI](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/aai/32/120_2.png) [@AAI](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/AAI)\ **Post date:** [December 30, 2022, 10:45pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/17 "2022-12-30T22:45:16Z")
Yes, I support this proposal! It’s in everyone’s best interest, and it’s aimed at the best! ---
**Author:** ![NIKA](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/nika/32/141_2.png) [@NIKA](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/NIKA)\ **Post date:** [December 30, 2022, 10:53pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/18 "2022-12-30T22:53:56Z")
Compared to the existing proposals, this proposal is one of the good options and I support it. 👍 ---
**Author:** ![EY84](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/ey84/32/42_2.png) [@EY84](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/EY84)\ **Post date:** [December 31, 2022, 4:52pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/19 "2022-12-31T16:52:59Z")
I express my support for this proposal ---
**Author:** ![Shawnm](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6f9a4e/32.png) [@Shawnm](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/Shawnm)\ **Post date:** [December 31, 2022, 11:48pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/20 "2022-12-31T23:48:28Z")
Cool dude 🙂 unfortunately not the team nor the whales don’t care about your proposal. All community members proposals will go straight down to the trash and will be archived. If they put your proposal into voting they will show big No finger into your face by their whale servants Bob, Bib, Boob. I just laughed non stop when I wrote this :))))))) ---
**Author:** ![0xZZ](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/0xzz/32/108_2.png) [@0xZZ](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/0xZZ)\ **Post date:** [January 1, 2023, 9:57am UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/21 "2023-01-01T09:57:49Z")
**Update: I’ve just applied the latest changes due to this comment from the CTO of Hashflow:** > [@\[RFC\] Allow affected users of NFT allocation termination to convert to veHFT](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/allow-affected-users-of-nft-allocation-termination-to-convert-to-vehft/484/5): > > I’ve been talking to people separately on Discord, but putting my concerns here for visibility. If we ve-lock tokens: they should be locked for a max or close to max period of time – this would result in at least 2y worth of lock these tokens would be unlocked all at once there could be some imbalances in voting power, prolonging the issues we have with voting power distribution rn Changed from “locking as VeHFT in Hashverse” to → “Reschedule vesting”, so that this proposal will stay possible to implement and less buggy! Let’s see what will happen next 🙂 ---
**Author:** ![AAI](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/aai/32/120_2.png) [@AAI](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/AAI)\ **Post date:** [January 1, 2023, 4:49pm UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/22 "2023-01-01T16:49:09Z")
> [@0xZZ](#): > > - **30% \< x \<= 40%:** unvested tokens will be rescheduled to vesting for **3 months**. > - **20% \< x \<= 30%** : unvested tokens will be rescheduled to vesting for **6 months**. > - **x \<= 20%** : unvested tokens will be rescheduled to vesting for **9 months**. @0xZZ I think we should specify the exact date and time of the start of unlocking (so as not to raise additional questions) ---
**Author:** ![waleedaj](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/f17d59/32.png) [@waleedaj](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/waleedaj)\ **Post date:** [January 2, 2023, 1:26am UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/23 "2023-01-02T01:26:11Z")
No I disagree with this proposal and it will add more pressure selling on token ---
**Author:** ![brian](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/gov.hashflow.com/brian/32/162_2.png) [@brian](https://gov.hashflow.com/u/brian)\ **Post date:** [January 2, 2023, 1:36am UTC](https://gov.hashflow.com/t/rfc-reschedule-vesting-of-high-potential-sellers-to-slow-down-token-emission/489/24 "2023-01-02T01:36:55Z")